Cyclists Train Like Machines While Runners Hold Back

Running sucks. Sorry, it just does.

It’s harsh on your body, it burns, and most of the time, it makes you feel like you’ve been hit by a truck.

But then you see cyclists—the same ones you scoff at for wearing tight Lycra, for spending hours on a saddle—and you think: they train like machines.

Cyclists will happily ride for 6 hours. Six!

Meanwhile, runners cap themselves at two hours, three max, because beyond that, their knees, hips, and backs start to scream.

So what’s going on? Why do cyclists churn through the miles like they’re on autopilot while runners hold back, limiting themselves to a mere fraction of that time?

Here’s the breakdown.

Grab a seat, because you’re about to find out why cycling is the endurance sport you can’t ignore.

1. Low Impact, High Volume

Cycling is a mechanical sport.

The bike supports you, takes on much of the weight, and rolls over the terrain, so your body doesn’t absorb all the shock.

In contrast, every step you take while running sends a jolt through your joints and muscles.

That’s why you can run for hours on end, but your body starts to shut down at a certain point.

Cycling, on the other hand, is more of a sustained effort—your legs do the work, but there’s no brutal pounding.

2. Biking Is Less Fatiguing (When You’re Not Pushing Hard)

Let’s face it—biking isn’t all that tough if you’re not climbing hills or pushing a massive gear. You can coast, ride downhill, and catch a break.

In running, there are no coasting moments. You’re in it until the end.

So, while cyclists rack up hours, much of it isn’t spent at a punishing pace, unlike a hard-run tempo.

3. Why Cyclists Can Do More

Cyclists, especially at the amateur level, can push through 4-5 hour rides with ease.

That’s not because they’re superhuman, but because cycling allows for a much lower intensity over longer periods.

For runners, hitting the same duration would mean seriously pounding their bodies, which, let’s be honest, no one’s going to walk away from unscathed.

You can’t just run 6 hours, not without destroying your knees.

4. The Physical Limits of Running

Running forces your body to bear all your weight. Every step is like slamming a hammer into your body—hard.

Even elite runners, who might log up to 100 miles a week, can’t stretch that time into the massive volume cyclists put in.

The impact makes it physically impossible for runners to spend as much time training.

The body doesn’t recover fast enough to allow for that kind of volume.

Cyclists? They’re just pedaling. It’s easy on the joints.

5. How Cross-Training Can Help

It’s a known secret in the running world: many runners cross-train with cycling or pool running.

The reason? To get in more aerobic volume without the risk of injury.

Your body can only take so much pounding before it starts breaking down, but you can safely accumulate hours on a bike or in a pool, helping you build your aerobic capacity without risking a breakdown.

In fact, many professional runners, when injured, often turn to cycling to maintain their fitness.

6. Cycling’s Mental Game

Cycling can be boring—there, I said it.

You’re stuck on a bike for hours, staring at the road ahead, counting down the miles.

But the fact remains, it’s easier to zone out. Running, on the other hand, demands a higher mental focus.

You can’t really “relax” during a 2-hour run.

You’re constantly thinking about your form, your pace, your breathing.

Cyclists can go into a trance-like state, turning off their minds and just riding. This allows them to go longer and endure more.

---

Summary Table

Aspect	Cycling	Running
Impact	Low impact (bike supports weight)	High impact (body absorbs shock)
Training Volume	High volume (hours of riding)	Lower volume (2 hours max)
Intensity	Low to moderate	Moderate to high
Duration	Long rides (4-6+ hours)	Shorter duration (2-3 hours)
Cross-Training Potential	Great for aerobic endurance	Limited cross-training options
Physical Limits	Fewer physical barriers	High risk of injury, limited volume
Mental Load	Easier to zone out	Higher mental engagement required

---

Conclusion

So here’s the thing. Cyclists train longer because their bodies are allowed to.

The bike doesn’t beat them up like running does. It’s a sweet ride of momentum and mechanical magic.

Meanwhile, runners are stuck with gravity and their own stubborn legs.

Sure, they could crank out more time, but their body would break before they hit their peak.

So, yeah, cycling looks easy in comparison. But it’s not the sport that’s the challenge—it’s the body you’ve got in the saddle.

In the end, it’s all about your limits. Runners hit theirs quicker. Cyclists? Well, they just keep pedaling.

And here’s a twist: maybe it’s time we let both sports be.

Maybe one’s not better than the other. Maybe we’re all just playing this game of pain in different ways.